So, why would Cisco buy them and go on to dilute their expertise just so you can use server-side flash for UCS? It's definitely top five in its category. But imagining that Cisco will sit out the flash-based array wave defies logical.Īnd so it brings up a question: Why would Cisco contain itself to that one goal? WhipTail is right up there with Fusion- io, Violin Memory and others. The idea that WhipTail will offer server-side cache for UCS blades is a great idea and I'm sure Cisco is already on that integration even before the acquisition closes. I'd agree with the first part, but on the second part, I doubt Cisco can't help but get into the storage business with an acquisition that's worth half a billion dollars. Cisco says it doesn't intend to get into the storage business and compete-the company values its storage partners. To hear it from industry analysts, especially those who cover storage, Cisco simply acquired Whiptail to provide server-side cache for its UCS blade servers. We'll get into that later, but first, let's look at the WhipTail buy. Cisco's acquisition of WhipTail looks to be just the start of other acquisitions to follow in the storage space. I have predicted for a long time now that Cisco would get into the storage business and that EMC will acquire a networking company. I read so many explanations and so many analyses trying to come to grips with it myself. The announcement sent shockwaves across the flash industry, and it sent Cisco storage partners NetApp and EMC scrambling to explain the acquisition to their partners and customers. Cisco's Buying Spree Just Started with WhipTailĪ few months ago Cisco announced that it acquired WhipTail, a flash array manufacturer.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |